On Dec 29, 2014, at 10:03 AM, Ярослав Бабаянц <[email protected]> wrote:

> Any news?
> 
> Send dubug with explore one more time
> in attach

Unless I am mistaken, there is no new information in the latest debug output.

One odd thing in the HID dump is that DesignCapacity appears twice, with very 
different values:

Path: UPS.BatterySystem.Battery.DesignCapacity, ReportID: 0x23, Offset: 0, 
Size: 32, Value: 18000
...
Path: UPS.PowerSummary.CapacityGranularity1, ReportID: 0x0c, Offset: 0, Size: 
8, Value: 1
Path: UPS.PowerSummary.CapacityMode, ReportID: 0x0c, Offset: 8, Size: 8, Value: 
2
Path: UPS.PowerSummary.DesignCapacity, ReportID: 0x0c, Offset: 16, Size: 8, 
Value: 100
Path: UPS.PowerSummary.FullChargeCapacity, ReportID: 0x0c, Offset: 24, Size: 8, 
Value: 100

(These are both 'Type: Feature'.)

From pdcv10.pdf, UPS.BatterySystem.Battery.DesignCapacity should be in 
CapacityMode units, and CapacityMode==2 is %. But since CapacityMode is in 
UPS.PowerSummary, maybe it refers to UPS.PowerSummary.DesignCapacity instead. 
The 18000 might be mAh or mWh.

It is also possible that one of UPS.PowerSummary.DesignCapacity or 
UPS.PowerSummary.FullChargeCapacity was intended to be RemainingCapacity. You 
can verify this by forcing the UPS onto battery power until the front panel 
displays a charge lower than 100%.

I do not see any items which are likely to be runtime.

-- 
Charles Lepple
clepple@gmail



_______________________________________________
Nut-upsuser mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser

Reply via email to