On Sep 15, 2016, at 7:45 AM, Ingo Fischer wrote:
>
> But would it not be an idea to have a gerneric "linux" driver for nut?
Good point. When I think "generic", I think "programmable"[*], but you are
right - the /sys interface is fairly standard.
[*] ("programmable" is a bit heavy for this application, although work is
progressing on embedding a Lua interpreter for some drivers)
I created a Github issue so we don't forget about this:
https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/319
Do the files under /sys/class/power_supply/battery look the same as on a
laptop? Does upower already handle them? (I think that the use cases for upower
and a NUT /sys driver are sufficiently different that they can both exist, but
if they have already solved compatibility problems...)
_______________________________________________
Nut-upsuser mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
