On Dec 4, 2017, at 2:43 PM, Lee Damon <no...@ee.washington.edu> wrote: > > I have it "working" with the following settings changes from the default > in the RPM. By "working" I mean it starts after reboot and after issuing > 'sudo systemctl restart nut-driver' but, as expected, it takes quite a > while to finish startup.
Yeah, this doesn't sound ideal. How close do the EPEL RPM's systemd configuration files look to the ones in the NUT tree? e.g. https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/blob/v2.7.2/scripts/systemd/nut-driver.service.in If the EPEL RPMs have a bug tracker, it might be worth pinging them about it. The "StopWhenUnneeded=no" part is odd, in my mind, although the idea is for "upsdrvctl start" to start the drivers, let them fork, then exit. (Were you running "upsdrvctl -D start" at the command line or under systemd? I would not expect the latter to work without modifications.) There is also a proposal for reworking the NUT driver startup under systemd, in case problems crop up later, and you want to revisit this: https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/pull/330 As I understand it, the drivers would each get their own systemd unit, so that might be easier for isolating failures. _______________________________________________ Nut-upsuser mailing list Nutemail@example.com http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser