Another way of looking at it might be to ask the question what would make a 
great 1.0 release? What new features would be awesome? What might get people 
more excited?

Having a 1.0 might make the project look like it has attained a real milestone.

Steve
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrzej Bialecki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 2:38 PM
> To: nutch-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Next release - 0.10.0 or 1.0.0 ?
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I know it's a trivial issue, but still ... When this release is out, I
> propose that we should name the next release 1.0.0, and not 0.10.0. The
> effect is purely psychological, but it also reflects our confidence in
> the platform.
> 
> Many Open Source projects are afraid of going to 1.0.0 and seem to be
> unable to ever reach this level, as if it were a magic step beyond
> which
> they are obliged to make some implied but unjustified promises ...
> Perhaps it's because in the commercial world everyone knows what a
> 1.0.0
> release means :) The downside of the version numbering that never
> reaches 1.0.0 is that casual users don't know how usable the software
> is
> - e.g. Nutch 0.10.0 could possibly mean that there are still 90
> releases
> to go before it becomes usable.
> 
> Therefore I propose the following:
> 
> * shorten the release cycle, so that we can make a release at least
> once
> every quarter. This was discussed before, and I hope we can make it
> happen, especially with the help of new forces that joined the team ;)
> 
> * call the next version 1.0.0, and continue in increments of 0.1.0 for
> each bi-monhtly or quarterly release,
> 
> * make critical bugfix / maintenance releases using increments of 0.0.1
> - although the need for such would be greatly diminished with the
> shorter release cycle.
> 
> * once we arrive at versions greater than x.5.0 we should plan for a
> big
> release (increment of 1.0.0).
> 
> * we should use only single digits for small increments, i.e. limit
> them
> to values between 0-9.
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> 
> --
> Best regards,
> Andrzej Bialecki     <><
>   ___. ___ ___ ___ _ _   __________________________________
> [__ || __|__/|__||\/|  Information Retrieval, Semantic Web
> ___|||__||  \|  ||  |  Embedded Unix, System Integration
> http://www.sigram.com  Contact: info at sigram dot com

Reply via email to