On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 23:46, Sami Siren <ssi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sami Siren wrote: >> >> Andrzej Bialecki wrote: >>> >>> How about the following: we build just 2 packages: >>> >>> * binary: this includes only base hadoop libs in lib/ (enough to start a >>> local job, no optional filesystems etc), the *.job and *.war files and >>> scripts. Scripts would check for the presence of plugins/ dir, and offer an >>> option to create it from *.job. Assumption here is that this shouldbe enough >>> to run full cycle in local mode, and that people who want to run a >>> distributed cluster will first install a plain Hadoop release, and then just >>> put the *.job and bin/nutch on the master. >>> >>> * source: no build artifacts, no .svn (equivalent to svn export), simple >>> tgz. >> >> >> this sounds good to me. additionally some new documentation needs to be >> written too. >> > > I added a simple patch to NUTCH-728 to make a plain source release from svn, > what do people think should we add the plain source package into next rc. I > would not like to make changes to binary package now but propose that we do > those changes post 1.0. >
+1 for including plain source release in next rc. As for, local/distributed separation, it is a good idea but I think we should hold it for 1.1 (or something else) if it requires architectural changes (thus needs review and testing). > -- > Sami Siren > -- Doğacan Güney
