Doğacan Güney wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 23:46, Sami Siren <ssi...@gmail.com> wrote:
Sami Siren wrote:
Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
How about the following: we build just 2 packages:
* binary: this includes only base hadoop libs in lib/ (enough to start a
local job, no optional filesystems etc), the *.job and *.war files and
scripts. Scripts would check for the presence of plugins/ dir, and offer an
option to create it from *.job. Assumption here is that this shouldbe enough
to run full cycle in local mode, and that people who want to run a
distributed cluster will first install a plain Hadoop release, and then just
put the *.job and bin/nutch on the master.
* source: no build artifacts, no .svn (equivalent to svn export), simple
tgz.
this sounds good to me. additionally some new documentation needs to be
written too.
I added a simple patch to NUTCH-728 to make a plain source release from svn,
what do people think should we add the plain source package into next rc. I
would not like to make changes to binary package now but propose that we do
those changes post 1.0.
+1 for including plain source release in next rc.
As for, local/distributed separation, it is a good idea but I think we
should hold
it for 1.1 (or something else) if it requires architectural changes
(thus needs review
and testing).
Yes, sorry for not being more explicit - my proposal was for 1.1, I
think 1.0 has to go out as it is (and I'd even hesitate to create a
source-only release now - we would have to test that it's still
buildable and fully functional.)
--
Best regards,
Andrzej Bialecki <><
___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________
[__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web
___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration
http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com
