Zaheed Haque wrote: > On 1/21/07, Andrzej Bialecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> Well ... so far this process was very informal, because there were so >> few key developers that they more or less knew what needs to be done, >> and who is doing what. >> >> Hadoop follows a much stricter and formalized model, which we could >> adopt, since it apparently works well there. This should address the >> issue of notifying others that the work is started on this or that item. > > My 2 cents :-) .. I like the way Hadoop guys works! It is strict but you > to my > mind it brings more benefit to be structured/rigid for the newbie developer > cos you can follow every issue from start to end and all the comments in > between > I have notice some of the mailing list questions/answers related to > issues for example > are not in Nutch JIRA so to follow an issue you have to > go-back-and-forth consult > mailing list and JIRA.
What does the Hadoop project do differently than Nutch. I thought they both were run about the same way? Is it that all communication on issues goes through the JIRA? > > IMHO Nutch should adopt Hadoop model furthermore its probably to good > idea to > discuss it further cos soon Nutch will have an 0.9 release and > probably its a good time to > change to Hadoop style :-) I am for productivity and sometimes that requires change. Better now than later if it will help more people get involved and be productive. > > Just some thoughts. > > Cheers ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Nutch-developers mailing list Nutch-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nutch-developers