Zaheed Haque wrote:
> On 1/21/07, Andrzej Bialecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>>
>> Well ... so far this process was very informal, because there were so
>> few key developers that they more or less knew what needs to be done,
>> and who is doing what.
>>
>> Hadoop follows a much stricter and formalized model, which we could
>> adopt, since it apparently works well there. This should address the
>> issue of notifying others that the work is started on this or that item.
> 
> My 2 cents :-) .. I like the way Hadoop guys works! It is strict but you 
> to my
> mind it brings more benefit to be structured/rigid for the newbie developer
> cos you can follow every issue from start to end and all the comments in 
> between
> I have notice some of the mailing list questions/answers related to
> issues for example
> are not in Nutch JIRA so to follow an issue you have to
> go-back-and-forth consult
> mailing list and JIRA.

What does the Hadoop project do differently than Nutch.  I thought they 
both were run about the same way?  Is it that all communication on 
issues goes through the JIRA?
> 
> IMHO Nutch should adopt Hadoop model furthermore its probably to good 
> idea to
> discuss it further cos soon Nutch will have an 0.9 release and
> probably its a good time to
> change to Hadoop style :-)

I am for productivity and sometimes that requires change.  Better now 
than later if it will help more people get involved and be productive.
> 
> Just some thoughts.
> 
> Cheers

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Nutch-developers mailing list
Nutch-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nutch-developers

Reply via email to