Dennis Kubes wrote:
> What does the Hadoop project do differently than Nutch.  I thought 
> they both were run about the same way?  Is it that all communication 
> on issues goes through the JIRA?

The workflow is different - I'm not sure about the details, perhaps Doug 
can correct me if I'm wrong ... and yes, it uses JIRA extensively.

1. An issue is created
2. patches are added, removed commented, etc...
3. finally, a candidate patch is selected, and the issue is marked 
"Patch available".
4. An automated process applies the patch to a temporary copy, and 
checks whether it compiles and passes junit tests.
5. A list of patches in this state is available, and committers may pick 
from this list and apply them.
6. An explicit link is made between the issue and the change set 
committed to svn (Is this automated?)
7. The issue is marked as "Resolved", but not closed. I believe issues 
are closed only when a release is made, because issues in state 
"resolved" make up the Changelog. I believe this is also automated.

-- 
Best regards,
Andrzej Bialecki     <><
 ___. ___ ___ ___ _ _   __________________________________
[__ || __|__/|__||\/|  Information Retrieval, Semantic Web
___|||__||  \|  ||  |  Embedded Unix, System Integration
http://www.sigram.com  Contact: info at sigram dot com



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Nutch-developers mailing list
Nutch-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nutch-developers

Reply via email to