wangxu wrote: > Have anybody thought of replacing CrawlDb with any kind of Rational > DB,mysql,for example? > > Crawldb is so difficult to manipulate. > I often have the requirements to edit several entries in crawdb; > But that would cost too much waiting for the mapReduce.
Please make the following test using your favorite relational DB: * create a table with 300 mln rows and 10 columns of mixed type * select 1 mln rows, sorted by some value * update 1 mln rows to different values If you find that these operations take less time than with the current crawldb then we will have to revisit this issue. :) -- Best regards, Andrzej Bialecki <>< ___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________ [__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web ___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Nutch-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nutch-developers
