wangxu wrote: > Have anybody thought of replacing CrawlDb with any kind of Rational > DB,mysql,for example? > > Crawldb is so difficult to manipulate. > I often have the requirements to edit several entries in crawdb; > But that would cost too much waiting for the mapReduce. >
Once when I was young and restless I went through the path with relational db. It kind of worked with few million records. I am not trying to do it anymore. Perhaps your problem is that you process too few records at the time? Quite often I see examples where people fetch few hundred of few thousand pages at a time. It might be good amount for small crawls, but if your goal is bigger you need bigger segments to get there. -- Sami Siren ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Nutch-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nutch-developers
