> Actually thinking a bit further into this, I kind of agree with you. I > initially thought that the best approach would be to change > PluginRepository.get(Configuration) to PluginRepository.get() where > get() just creates a configuration internally and initializes itself > with it. But then we wouldn't be passing JobConf to PluginRepository > but PluginRepository would do something like a > NutchConfiguration.create(), which is probably wrong. > > So, all in all, I've come to believe that my (and Nicolas') patch is a > not-so-bad way of fixing this. It allows us to pass JobConf to > PluginRepository and stops creating new PluginRepository-s again and > again... > > What do you think?
IMO a better way would be to add a proper equals() method to Hadoop's Configuration object (and hashcode) that would call getProps().equals(o.getProps()). So that you could use them as keys... Every class which is a map from keys to values has "equals & hashcode" (Properties, HashMap, etc.). Another nice thing would be to be able to "freeze" a configuration object, preventing anyone from modifying it. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Nutch-developers mailing list Nutch-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nutch-developers