I believe we had a recent mail with problem of redirection also (with this patch applied..)
And as you said more people testing the patch would be better. Considering that this has the highest votes for add-on features, it is a critical one i guess. Rgds Prabhu On 3/31/06, Andrzej Bialecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Raghavendra Prabhu wrote: > > Hi Andrzej > > > > Can you put in the latest version of the diff for the adaptive fetch? > > > > Because we seem to have problem patching agains the latest release. > > > > This should help us test it. > > > > The patch is probably out of sync, there have been many (trivial) > changes in the meantime. The best option would be to commit this > functionality, if enough people consider it of a sufficiently good > quality. What prevents me from doing this is that I don't use this > version on a regular basis - the original version is good enough for my > use, even though not ideal. And I have a feeling that not too many > people really reviewed this patch. > > So, IMHO these patches need more testing, because the potential for > disruption is rather large. > > -- > Best regards, > Andrzej Bialecki <>< > ___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________ > [__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web > ___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration > http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com > > >
