Fix the NFIT parsing code to treat a 0 index in a SPA Range Structure as
a special case and not match Region Mapping Structures that use 0 to
indicate that they are not mapped. Without this fix some platform BIOS
descriptions of "virtual disk" ranges do not result in the pmem driver
attaching to the range.

Details:
In addition to typical persistent memory ranges, the ACPI NFIT may also
convey "virtual" ranges. These ranges are indicated by a UUID in the SPA
Range Structure of UUID_VOLATILE_VIRTUAL_DISK, UUID_VOLATILE_VIRTUAL_CD,
UUID_PERSISTENT_VIRTUAL_DISK, or UUID_PERSISTENT_VIRTUAL_CD. The
critical difference between virtual ranges and UUID_PERSISTENT_MEMORY, is
that virtual do not support associations with Region Mapping Structures.
For this reason the "index" value of virtual SPA Range Structures is
allowed to be 0. If a platform BIOS decides to represent unmapped
NVDIMMs with a 0 index in their "SPA Range Structure Index" the driver
falsely matches them and may falsely require labels where "virtual
disks" are expected to be label-less. I.e. label-less is where the
namespace-range == region-range and the pmem driver attaches with no
user action to create a namespace.

Cc: Jacek Zloch <[email protected]>
Cc: Lukasz Sobieraj <[email protected]>
Cc: "Lee, Chun-Yi" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Fixes: c2f32acdf848 ("acpi, nfit: treat virtual ramdisk SPA as pmem region")
Reported-by: Krzysztof Rusocki <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Damian Bassa <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c |    2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
index 23d9a09d7060..6f15e56ef955 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
@@ -3021,6 +3021,8 @@ static int acpi_nfit_register_region(struct 
acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
                struct acpi_nfit_memory_map *memdev = nfit_memdev->memdev;
                struct nd_mapping_desc *mapping;
 
+               if (memdev->range_index == 0 || spa->range_index == 0)
+                       continue;
                if (memdev->range_index != spa->range_index)
                        continue;
                if (count >= ND_MAX_MAPPINGS) {


Reply via email to