On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 10:56:58PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 07:46:14PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote: > > Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > > A remove callback just returning 0 is equivalent to no remove callback > > > at all. So drop the useless function. > > > > Looks good, applied. > > Thanks. I wonder why the patch doesn't appear in next though. Is this > deliberate?
Hmm, strange. This patch didn't make it in, but the same patch submitted by you later with a different commit log eventually made it in. v2 from Feb 10 2023 (https://lore.kernel.org/r/167602001664.1924368.9102029637928071240.st...@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com) was applied as 84fe17f8e9c68a4389c6e89b7ce3b4651b359989, initial series from Feb 05 (https://lore.kernel.org/all/167564542679.847146.17174404738816053065.st...@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com) I feel a bit humbugged, Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature