On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 10:56:58PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 07:46:14PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> > Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > A remove callback just returning 0 is equivalent to no remove callback
> > > at all. So drop the useless function.
> > 
> > Looks good, applied.
> 
> Thanks. I wonder why the patch doesn't appear in next though. Is this
> deliberate?

Hmm, strange. This patch didn't make it in, but the same patch submitted
by you later with a different commit log eventually made it in.

v2 from Feb 10 2023
(https://lore.kernel.org/r/167602001664.1924368.9102029637928071240.st...@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com)
was applied as 84fe17f8e9c68a4389c6e89b7ce3b4651b359989, initial series from 
Feb 05
(https://lore.kernel.org/all/167564542679.847146.17174404738816053065.st...@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com)

I feel a bit humbugged,
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to