+ linux-cxl mailing list
On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 05:58:52PM +0800, Coly Li wrote: > Hi list, > > Recently I have a report for a warning message from CXL subsystem, > [ 48.142342] cxl_port port2: Couldn't locate the CXL.cache and CXL.mem > capability array header. > [ 48.144690] cxl_port port3: Couldn't locate the CXL.cache and CXL.mem > capability array header. > [ 48.144704] cxl_port port3: HDM decoder capability not found > [ 48.144850] cxl_port port4: Couldn't locate the CXL.cache and CXL.mem > capability array header. > [ 48.144859] cxl_port port4: HDM decoder capability not found > [ 48.170374] cxl_port port6: Couldn't locate the CXL.cache and CXL.mem > capability array header. > [ 48.172893] cxl_port port7: Couldn't locate the CXL.cache and CXL.mem > capability array header. > [ 48.174689] cxl_port port7: HDM decoder capability not found > [ 48.175091] cxl_port port8: Couldn't locate the CXL.cache and CXL.mem > capability array header. > [ 48.175105] cxl_port port8: HDM decoder capability not found > > After checking the source code I realize this is not a real bug, just a > warning message that expected device was not detected. > But from the above warning information itself, users/customers are worried > there is something wrong (IMHO indeed not). > > Is there any chance that we can improve the code logic that only printing out > the warning message when it is really a problem to be noticed? > > Thanks in advance. > > Coly Li
