On Wed, 7 Oct 2026 at 00:12, Amir Goldstein <[email protected]> wrote:
> #define FUSE_PASSTROUGH_PARAMS(max_backing_stack_depth, flags) \ > ((max_backing_stack_depth & 0xff) + 1) | ((flags & 0xff) << 8) I don't think that beast belongs in a public header. That alone is a reason not to go this way. > It also avoid the unneeded questions/documentation/awkwardness > regarding FUSE_PASSTHROUGH_V2 with/out FUSE_PASSTHROUGH "If FUSE_PASSTHROUGH_V2 is set, FUSE_PASSTHROUGH is ignored" Thanks, Miklos
