> > As has been pointed out a number of times, pure data plane learning
> leads
> > to a lot of BUM traffic flooding, so a combination of data plane and
> control
> > plane can work better with existing systems and improve scalability.
> 
> Data plane learning, l2 header transparency, bridging interoperability
> are all very reasonable requirements for one type of data-centers. But
> also an unacceptable burden for a different class of DC designs. In my
> view you and Maria are just looking at different types of DC designs.
> They are different problems.

Precisely. And my comment was that the sentence in draft: "Often a combination 
of data plane and control based learning is necessary" seems to be assuming 
that pretty much all data centers must use (some) data plane learning. I have 
suggested to clarify it.

Maria


>    Pedro.
> 
> >
> > Thanks,
> > --David
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
> Of
> >> NAPIERALA, MARIA H
> >> Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 2:14 PM
> >> To: [email protected]
> >> Subject: Re: [nvo3] call for adoption: draft-lasserre-nvo3-
> framework-02
> >>
> >> A comment on section 4.2.2 "Coordination between data plane and
> control plane"
> >>
> >>   "Often a combination of data plane and control based learning is
> >>   necessary."
> >>
> >> I think this statement is too strong since in a solution proposed in
> draft-
> >> marques-l3vpn-end-system, for example, there is no data plane
> learning in a
> >> virtual network. Maybe it should be explain when such combination is
> >> necessary.
> >>
> >> Maria
> >>
> >>
> >>> On 6/18/2012 11:51 PM, Benson Schliesser wrote:
> >>> Dear NVO3 Participants -
> >>>
> >>> This message begins a two week Call for Adoption of
> >>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lasserre-nvo3-framework-02
> >>> by the NVO3 working group, ending on 02-July-2012.
> >>>
> >>> Please respond to the NVO3 mailing list with any statements
> >>> of approval or disapproval, along with any additional
> >>> comments that
> >>> might explain your position. Also, if any NVO3 participant
> >>> is aware
> >>> of IPR associated with this draft, please inform the mailing list
> >>> and/or the NVO3 chairs.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> -Benson&  Matthew
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> nvo3 mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > nvo3 mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nvo3 mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3

Reply via email to