Maria, What about the following rewording?
"A combination of data plane and control plane based learning may be applicable." Marc > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of NAPIERALA, MARIA H > Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2012 2:18 AM > To: Pedro Roque Marques; <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [nvo3] call for adoption: > draft-lasserre-nvo3-framework-02 > > > > As has been pointed out a number of times, pure data > plane learning > > leads > > > to a lot of BUM traffic flooding, so a combination of > data plane and > > control > > > plane can work better with existing systems and improve > scalability. > > > > Data plane learning, l2 header transparency, bridging > interoperability > > are all very reasonable requirements for one type of > data-centers. But > > also an unacceptable burden for a different class of DC > designs. In my > > view you and Maria are just looking at different types of > DC designs. > > They are different problems. > > Precisely. And my comment was that the sentence in draft: > "Often a combination of data plane and control based learning > is necessary" seems to be assuming that pretty much all data > centers must use (some) data plane learning. I have suggested > to clarify it. > > Maria > > > > Pedro. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > --David > > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > > >> Behalf > > Of > > >> NAPIERALA, MARIA H > > >> Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 2:14 PM > > >> To: [email protected] > > >> Subject: Re: [nvo3] call for adoption: draft-lasserre-nvo3- > > framework-02 > > >> > > >> A comment on section 4.2.2 "Coordination between data plane and > > control plane" > > >> > > >> "Often a combination of data plane and control based > learning is > > >> necessary." > > >> > > >> I think this statement is too strong since in a solution > proposed > > >> in > > draft- > > >> marques-l3vpn-end-system, for example, there is no data plane > > learning in a > > >> virtual network. Maybe it should be explain when such > combination > > >> is necessary. > > >> > > >> Maria > > >> > > >> > > >>> On 6/18/2012 11:51 PM, Benson Schliesser wrote: > > >>> Dear NVO3 Participants - > > >>> > > >>> This message begins a two week Call for Adoption of > > >>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lasserre-nvo3-framework-02 > > >>> by the NVO3 working group, ending on 02-July-2012. > > >>> > > >>> Please respond to the NVO3 mailing list with any statements of > > >>> approval or disapproval, along with any additional > comments that > > >>> might explain your position. Also, if any NVO3 participant is > > >>> aware of IPR associated with this draft, please inform > the mailing > > >>> list and/or the NVO3 chairs. > > >>> > > >>> Thanks, > > >>> -Benson& Matthew > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> nvo3 mailing list > > >> [email protected] > > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > nvo3 mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > nvo3 mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 > _______________________________________________ > nvo3 mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 > _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
