On 7/20/12 10:48 PM, Ivan Pepelnjak wrote:
[M1b] The orchestration system *is not *involved in VM memory move. That would place unnecessary burden on the orchestration system and increase the latency/time-to-move.
It is not clear to me that the amount of latency introduced would actually be a burden given the existing time-to-move, but I think it's worth considering how any associated network state (middleboxes, primarily - i.e. firewalls) would be migrated in parallel with the VM, and which network elements would need to be involved. Melinda _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
