This email closes this call for WG adoption. There is consensus to adopt this draft.
Please could the authors republish the draft, renaming it as draft-ietf-nvo3-overlay-problem-statement-00, and incorporating the comment from Thomas Morin. There were also some other comments on the list that probably need further consideration. Best regards Matthew & Benson On 14/08/2012 16:48, "Bocci, Matthew (Matthew)" <[email protected]> wrote: >All, > >At the Vancouver IETF, there was considerable support for adopting >draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problem-statement-03 as an NVO3 working group >document. However, there was also some support for >draft-fang-vpn4dc-problem-statement-01. > >Therefore, the chairs asked authors from both drafts, with help from Eric >Gray, to work together on a common problem statement draft, the result of >which is the subject of this adoption poll. > >If you support adoption of draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problem-statement-04, >please reply to this thread with 'support'. > >If you do not support adoption, please reply to this thread with 'do not >support', and state your reasons. > >This poll will close on Tuesday 28th August 2012. > >Note that we will be polling for adoption of the NVO3 framework draft >separately. We will start that poll in a separate thread, shortly. > >Regards > >Matthew & Benson > > > >_______________________________________________ >nvo3 mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
