Lou, Do you see the terms "Controller" or "Orchestrator" standing up to David Black's "BGP" litmus test?
- Larry On 4/9/13 3:18 PM, "Lou Berger" <[email protected]> wrote: > >On 4/8/2013 9:12 PM, Larry Kreeger (kreeger) wrote: >> At the NVO3 WG meeting in Orlando, I brought up some suggestions for >> terminology changes/additions and had an AI to bring this to the listŠso >> here goes. I would prefer to see constructive suggestions in responses. >> In other words, please suggest something better if you object to these. >> >> 1) Oracle -> Information Mapping Authority >> >> Stewart mentioned that he has copyright concerns with using the term >> "oracle", and others have expressed distaste as well. >> In draft-kreeger-nvo3-hypervisor-nve-cp-01 we replaced the term with >> "Information Mapping Authority" (IMA). We would like to get consensus >> on using this new term in all WG documents going forward. In the >> meeting Linda expressed a concern that IMA might get confused with IMA >> being confused with the acronym for Inverse Multiplexing for ATM, and >> suggested something like "Directory Service" to which David Black >> replied that she might have trouble convincing people that BGP can be >> categorized as a "Directory Service". >> > >Perhaps we're over thinking this one. We have NVE, so why not >NV Controller (NVC) or NV Orchestrator (NVO)? > >Lou > >>... _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
