Also...

NVS - Network Virtualization Server
NVC - Network Virtualization Controller
NVO - Network Virtualization Orchestrator

On 4/9/2013 8:27 PM, Larry Kreeger (kreeger) wrote:
> Lou,
> 
> Given your criteria for starting with NV, we could potentially have one of
> the following:
> 
> NVS - Network Virtualization Service (service seems vague and perhaps an
> overloaded term)
> NVA - Network Virtualization Authority (may be vague)
> NVMA - Network Virtualization Mapping Authority (less vague)
> NVO - Network Virtualization Oracle (assuming oracle is OK when it has the
> NV prefix)
> 
>  - Larry
> 
> On 4/9/13 4:51 PM, "Lou Berger" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Larry,
>>      I think the NVC and NVO terms are fairly solution neutral, i.e., I
>> don't see why not.
>>
>> I guess your question does lead to yet another option
>> NVS: Network Virtualization Service
>>
>> I personally like NVC, but given that we have NVEs, I'd be happy with
>> anything of the form "Network Virtualization <foo>" as long as <foo>
>> doesn't start with an "E".
>>
>> Lou
>>
>> On 4/9/2013 7:25 PM, Larry Kreeger (kreeger) wrote:
>>> Lou,
>>>
>>> Do you see the terms "Controller" or "Orchestrator" standing up to David
>>> Black's "BGP" litmus test?
>>>
>>>  - Larry
>>>
>>> On 4/9/13 3:18 PM, "Lou Berger" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 4/8/2013 9:12 PM, Larry Kreeger (kreeger) wrote:
>>>>> At the NVO3 WG meeting in Orlando, I brought up some suggestions for
>>>>> terminology changes/additions and had an AI to bring this to the
>>>>> listŠso
>>>>> here goes.  I would prefer to see constructive suggestions in
>>>>> responses.
>>>>>  In other words, please suggest something better if you object to
>>>>> these.
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) Oracle -> Information Mapping Authority
>>>>>
>>>>> Stewart mentioned that he has copyright concerns with using the term
>>>>> "oracle", and others have expressed distaste as well.
>>>>>  In draft-kreeger-nvo3-hypervisor-nve-cp-01 we replaced the term with
>>>>> "Information Mapping Authority" (IMA).  We would like to get consensus
>>>>> on using this new term in all WG documents going forward.  In the
>>>>> meeting Linda  expressed a concern that IMA might get confused with
>>>>> IMA
>>>>> being confused with the acronym for Inverse Multiplexing for ATM, and
>>>>> suggested something like "Directory Service" to which David Black
>>>>> replied that she might have trouble convincing people that BGP can be
>>>>> categorized as a "Directory Service".
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps we're over thinking this one.  We have NVE, so why not
>>>> NV Controller (NVC) or NV Orchestrator (NVO)?
>>>>
>>>> Lou
>>>>
>>>>> ...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nvo3 mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
> 
> 
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3

Reply via email to