That is the option I have thought about. I used this term (i.e.,NVE controller) in my presentation of Orlando meeting.
Regards! -Qin -----邮件原件----- 发件人: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 Lou Berger 发送时间: 2013年4月10日 6:19 收件人: Larry Kreeger (kreeger) 抄送: [email protected] 主题: Re: [nvo3] NVO3 Terminology changes On 4/8/2013 9:12 PM, Larry Kreeger (kreeger) wrote: > At the NVO3 WG meeting in Orlando, I brought up some suggestions for > terminology changes/additions and had an AI to bring this to the list…so > here goes. I would prefer to see constructive suggestions in responses. > In other words, please suggest something better if you object to these. > > 1) Oracle -> Information Mapping Authority > > Stewart mentioned that he has copyright concerns with using the term > "oracle", and others have expressed distaste as well. > In draft-kreeger-nvo3-hypervisor-nve-cp-01 we replaced the term with > "Information Mapping Authority" (IMA). We would like to get consensus > on using this new term in all WG documents going forward. In the > meeting Linda expressed a concern that IMA might get confused with IMA > being confused with the acronym for Inverse Multiplexing for ATM, and > suggested something like "Directory Service" to which David Black > replied that she might have trouble convincing people that BGP can be > categorized as a "Directory Service". > Perhaps we're over thinking this one. We have NVE, so why not NV Controller (NVC) or NV Orchestrator (NVO)? Lou >... _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
