Hi Larry,
I wonder if point C or D is feasible in implementation. In my
understanding, the TSI must be a virtual port which could be associated
with the special VN, and transmit/receive packets from tenant system (the
virtual port terminology is used in many switch chip). If we use one IP
address, we could not treat it as a virtual port. One simple example, if
packet with broadcast IP address received, will this packet be send to IP_a
and IP_b on the same vNIC?

I don't think we need to define such kind of detail for TSI. The TSI
definition is implementation related. I could define the TSI with a VLAN
(piont B in your figure), or define TSI with a priority queue within one
vNIC.

BTW, I like the name TSI, and remove NIC/vNIC/pNIC. pNIC is closely related
with data transfer between network and host stack, and it is usually a
controller without MAC&PHY. vNIC is a driver function or virtual
function(defined by SR-IOV). A TSI could also be a vNIC teaming interface
by teaming driver. So "interface" is a appropriate name to define a Tx/Rx
channel between tenant system and VN.

Regards
Lizhong



> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Larry Kreeger (kreeger)" <[email protected]>
> To: Qin Wu <[email protected]>, Anoop Ghanwani <[email protected]>,
> "Black, David" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "Reith, Lothar" <
> [email protected]>
> Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 16:55:50 +0000
> Subject: Re: [nvo3] NVO3 Terminology changes
>  Hi Qin,
>
>  A VM is one possible implementation of a Tenant System. I have not seen
> anyone suggesting that a Tenant System get more granular than that.
>
>  Regarding what defines a TSI, someone could choose any branch in the
> tree below to define as the TSI.  I was assuming that the TSI would be at
> point A below in the tree.  However, point B would correspond the the VAP.
>  Pat had mentioned having the TSI at point D.  I think if we were to define
> the TSI to be either point C or point D, then it would depend on the
> service being given (L2 or L3).  I would prefer it to be at point A or B.
>
>           VNIC-+-VN-+-MAC-+-IP
>            ^  |    |     +-IP ...
>            |  |    |
>            |  |    +-MAC-+-IP
>            |  |          +-IP ...
>            |  |
>            |  +-VN-+-MAC-+-IP
>            |     ^ |     +-IP ...
>            |     | |
>            |     | +-MAC-+-IP
>            |     |    ^  +-IP ...
>            |     |    |     ^
>            |     |    |     |
>            A     B    C     D
>
>   - Larry
>
>
_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3

Reply via email to