On 4/10/2013 11:28 AM, Linda Dunbar wrote:
> We are talking about an entity that has information on inner-outer
> address mapping, and potentially other host (VMs or Servers) location
> information. This entity is orthogonal to “virtualization”.

Do I understand your point correctly, that you're suggesting that this
discussion is orthogonal to the "V" in technologies such as L3VPN,
L2VPN/EVPN, NVGRE, VXLAN, ...?

Lou

> 
>  
> 
> Therefore, I think “Network Mapping Authority” or “Host Location
> Information Service” is more accurate.
> 
>  
> 
> Linda
> 
>  
> 
> *From:*[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf
> Of *Truman Boyes
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 09, 2013 11:48 PM
> *To:* Lou Berger
> *Cc:* [email protected]; Larry Kreeger (kreeger)
> *Subject:* Re: [nvo3] NVO3 Terminology changes
> 
>  
> 
> Hi,
> 
>  
> 
> I think the below two suggestions provide the clearest terminology and
> description for the function:
> 
>  
> 
> NVA - Network Virtualization Authority (may be vague)
> 
> NVMA - Network Virtualization Mapping Authority (less vague)
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> BGP might not be a mapping service; but with a stretch of the
> imagination the mapping of NLRI to prefix/communities/etc could fulfil
> the litmus test. 
> 
>  
> 
> The below words of 'server', 'controller', and 'orchestrator' carry a
> lot of baggage/meaning at the moment and might convey other meanings. I
> like the NVMA as a functional element.
> 
>  
> 
> NVMA +1
> 
>  
> 
> Truman
> 
>  
> 
> On 9 Apr, 2013, at 9:04 PM, Lou Berger <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Also...
> 
> NVS - Network Virtualization Server
> NVC - Network Virtualization Controller
> NVO - Network Virtualization Orchestrator
> 
> On 4/9/2013 8:27 PM, Larry Kreeger (kreeger) wrote:
> 
> Lou,
> 
> Given your criteria for starting with NV, we could potentially have one of
> the following:
> 
> NVS - Network Virtualization Service (service seems vague and perhaps an
> overloaded term)
> NVA - Network Virtualization Authority (may be vague)
> NVMA - Network Virtualization Mapping Authority (less vague)
> NVO - Network Virtualization Oracle (assuming oracle is OK when it has the
> NV prefix)
> 
> - Larry
> 
> On 4/9/13 4:51 PM, "Lou Berger" <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
> 
> Larry,
>           I think the NVC and NVO terms are fairly solution neutral, i.e., I
> don't see why not.
> 
> I guess your question does lead to yet another option
> NVS: Network Virtualization Service
> 
> I personally like NVC, but given that we have NVEs, I'd be happy with
> anything of the form "Network Virtualization <foo>" as long as <foo>
> doesn't start with an "E".
> 
> Lou
> 
> On 4/9/2013 7:25 PM, Larry Kreeger (kreeger) wrote:
> 
> Lou,
> 
> Do you see the terms "Controller" or "Orchestrator" standing up to David
> Black's "BGP" litmus test?
> 
> - Larry
> 
> On 4/9/13 3:18 PM, "Lou Berger" <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 4/8/2013 9:12 PM, Larry Kreeger (kreeger) wrote:
> 
> At the NVO3 WG meeting in Orlando, I brought up some suggestions for
> terminology changes/additions and had an AI to bring this to the
> listŠso
> here goes.  I would prefer to see constructive suggestions in
> responses.
> In other words, please suggest something better if you object to
> these.
> 
> 1) Oracle -> Information Mapping Authority
> 
> Stewart mentioned that he has copyright concerns with using the term
> "oracle", and others have expressed distaste as well.
> In draft-kreeger-nvo3-hypervisor-nve-cp-01 we replaced the term with
> "Information Mapping Authority" (IMA).  We would like to get consensus
> on using this new term in all WG documents going forward.  In the
> meeting Linda  expressed a concern that IMA might get confused with
> IMA
> being confused with the acronym for Inverse Multiplexing for ATM, and
> suggested something like "Directory Service" to which David Black
> replied that she might have trouble convincing people that BGP can be
> categorized as a "Directory Service".
> 
> 
> Perhaps we're over thinking this one.  We have NVE, so why not
> NV Controller (NVC) or NV Orchestrator (NVO)?
> 
> Lou
> 
> 
> ...
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nvo3 mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nvo3 mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
> 
>  
> 
_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3

Reply via email to