Hi Authors,
After reading this draft, I find it still combines many possible options
(e.g, dataplane). Hope to see a draft with much more clear opinion in next
version.

Several comments below:
1. Since TS is the end of the network, flow (e.g, 5 tuple) based VN
forwarding would bring much network flexibility. The L2/L3 VN service is
the traditional service, but I believe the VN should have the capability to
provide a flow based forwarding service.
2. Is there a standard interface between NVA and VM orchestration, or a
private interface? Hope to see more description in detail.
3. If push and pull are supported, then how to combine the pull and push
mode should be described, which is closely related with NVE-NVA protocol.
4. section 12, why dataplane definition is not considered as the main area
of work?

Regards
Lizhong
_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3

Reply via email to