On 2/7/15 9:52 AM, Carter Bullard wrote: > David, > And it is still pretty simple. Want to do something different from what > is in the charter, change the charter. > But as long as the charter specifies a process, the WG should follow > that process.
The charter is negotiable as the working group makes (or doesn't make) progress, and despite your assertions to the contrary, there are other documents that govern working group process. If I had to put it in standards language, the charter is informative and the process RFCs are normative. Out of curiosity, I went to look at what your experience with the IETF has been, and I found that you've submitted no drafts (and consequently have no working group drafts, which means that you haven't gotten a document through the working group process), and if you've attended a meeting it hasn't been in the last year and a half. The reason that I was curious about this is that your understanding about what the process is is significantly different from those with substantial experience with IETF process. You've been making an awful lot of assertions about what it is - what's your basis for it? Melinda _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
