On 2/17/2017 9:04 AM, Tom Herbert wrote: > But again, we don't have any examples of a protocol with ordered TLVs > that does this and there is no concrete proposal for doing this in > Geneve so this idea is just speculation. Ordered TLVs are the same thing as bitfields in known orders. The only difference is whether the protocol allows the flexibility, in alternate configurations, of supporting alternate fields in alternate orders.
However, the larger issue here is that the doc assumes a requirement for efficient support in current hardware. Joe _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list nvo3@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
