Yizhou,

Excellent.  Thank you.

Regards,
Alia

On Feb 7, 2018 12:56 AM, "Liyizhou" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Alia,
>
>
>
> Co-authors have agreed on to move RFC7365, RFC7666 and RFC8014 to
> normative references.
>
>
>
> We are asking for advice from IEEE on if we should reference IEEE 802.1Qbg
> by itself or reference it as a part of 802.1Q. I will put either 802.1Qbg
> or 802.1Q as normative and upload the revision after it is confirmed.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Yizhou
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Alia Atlas [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 07, 2018 5:22 AM
> *To:* [email protected]; [email protected]
> *Subject:* AD review of draft-ietf-nvo3-hpvr2nve-cp-req-13
>
>
>
> As is customary, I have done my AD review of draft-ietf-nvo3-hpvr2nve-
> cp-req-13.
>
> First, I would like to thank the authors - Yizhou, Donald,  Larry, Thomas,
> and David -
>
> as well as those who have reviewed this document and improved it for their
> work on
>
> this draft.
>
>
>
> My only concern with it is that there are no technical normative
> references.  From reading the text, it is quite clear that understanding
> the basic NVO3 architecture is rather important.  I would request that the
> authors and shepherds go through and move references as appropriate to
> normative.
>
>
>
> I have requested an IETF Last Call and the draft is on the IESG telechat
> for Feb 22.
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Alia
>
_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3

Reply via email to