Hello Yizhou, Since 802.1Qbg has been merged into 802.1Q per the normal IEEE 802 process, I would suggest referencing Std IEEE 802.1Q.
Paul On Feb 6, 2018 10:56 PM, "Liyizhou" <[email protected]> wrote: Alia, Co-authors have agreed on to move RFC7365, RFC7666 and RFC8014 to normative references. We are asking for advice from IEEE on if we should reference IEEE 802.1Qbg by itself or reference it as a part of 802.1Q. I will put either 802.1Qbg or 802.1Q as normative and upload the revision after it is confirmed. Thanks, Yizhou *From:* Alia Atlas [mailto:[email protected]] *Sent:* Wednesday, February 07, 2018 5:22 AM *To:* [email protected]; [email protected] *Subject:* AD review of draft-ietf-nvo3-hpvr2nve-cp-req-13 As is customary, I have done my AD review of draft-ietf-nvo3-hpvr2nve- cp-req-13. First, I would like to thank the authors - Yizhou, Donald, Larry, Thomas, and David - as well as those who have reviewed this document and improved it for their work on this draft. My only concern with it is that there are no technical normative references. From reading the text, it is quite clear that understanding the basic NVO3 architecture is rather important. I would request that the authors and shepherds go through and move references as appropriate to normative. I have requested an IETF Last Call and the draft is on the IESG telechat for Feb 22. Thank you, Alia _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
_______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
