Hi Dale,
great catch, thank you. Will correct to match the size of the Proto field,
6 bits-long, as defined in RFC 8296 in the next update of our draft.

Regards,
Greg

On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 7:52 PM, Dale R. Worley <wor...@ariadne.com> wrote:

> Greg Mirsky <gregimir...@gmail.com> writes:
> > you may be surprised to check BIER OAM, section 3.1 of
> draft-ietf-bier-ping
> > <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bier-ping-03> to be precise, as
> it
> > defines the header for active BIER OAM.
>
> Interesting.  But I note that in RFC 8296, the next protocol field
> ("Proto") is 6 bits, and the "BIER Next Protocol Identifiers" is defined
> to match.  But in draft-ietf-bier-ping-03, the "Proto" field is only 4
> bits, although it seems to intend that the values be taken fromn "BIER
> Next Protocol Identifiers".
>
> Dale
>
> _______________________________________________
> nvo3 mailing list
> nvo3@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
>
_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
nvo3@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3

Reply via email to