Hi Dale, great catch, thank you. Will correct to match the size of the Proto field, 6 bits-long, as defined in RFC 8296 in the next update of our draft.
Regards, Greg On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 7:52 PM, Dale R. Worley <wor...@ariadne.com> wrote: > Greg Mirsky <gregimir...@gmail.com> writes: > > you may be surprised to check BIER OAM, section 3.1 of > draft-ietf-bier-ping > > <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bier-ping-03> to be precise, as > it > > defines the header for active BIER OAM. > > Interesting. But I note that in RFC 8296, the next protocol field > ("Proto") is 6 bits, and the "BIER Next Protocol Identifiers" is defined > to match. But in draft-ietf-bier-ping-03, the "Proto" field is only 4 > bits, although it seems to intend that the values be taken fromn "BIER > Next Protocol Identifiers". > > Dale > > _______________________________________________ > nvo3 mailing list > firstname.lastname@example.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 >
_______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list email@example.com https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3