That’s great news that this can be a viable marking option for APN signaling.
Kind Regards Gyan On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 3:56 AM Pengshuping (Peng Shuping) < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Gyan, > > > > Many thanks for your information! > > > > I found the Group Policy ID explained as below, > > > > o Group Policy ID: 16-bit identifier that indicates the Group Policy > > ID being encapsulated by this GBP shim header. The Default GBP ID > > value is special and indicates that the GBP option was not set. > > Packet filters SHOULD be able to match on the Default GBP ID value > > as a way to match packets that do not have the GBP option set. > > The default Default GBP ID is 0, but MAY be configured to be a > > value other than 0. The allocation of Group Policy ID values is > > outside the scope of this document. > > > > It seems that we could add this in the gap analysis draft, > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-peng-apn-scope-gap-analysis/ > > > > Best regards, > > Shuping > > > > > > > > *From:* Gyan Mishra [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Monday, March 1, 2021 2:50 PM > *To:* Pengshuping (Peng Shuping) <[email protected]> > *Cc:* [email protected]; [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [nvo3] eVXLAN carrying Group information > > > > > > Shuping > > > > I am not sure if you are referring to VXLAN-GPE vxlan Generic protocol > extension which has changes in the vxlan header to support multi protocol > encapsulation, OAM and BUM. > > > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-nvo3-vxlan-gpe-10 > > > > > > The capabilities of the VXLAN-GPE protocol can be extended by > > defining next protocol "shim" headers that are used to implement new > > data plane functions. For example, Group-Based Policy (GBP) or In- > > situ Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM) metadata > > functionalities can be added as specified in > > [I-D.lemon-vxlan-lisp-gpe-gbp > <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-nvo3-vxlan-gpe-10#ref-I-D.lemon-vxlan-lisp-gpe-gbp>] > and > > [I-D.brockners-ippm-ioam-vxlan-gpe > <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-nvo3-vxlan-gpe-10#ref-I-D.brockners-ippm-ioam-vxlan-gpe>]. > > > > > > Kind Regards > > > > Gyan > > > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 10:21 PM Pengshuping (Peng Shuping) < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > Anybody knows about using eVXLAN to carry the Group information? What is > the scenario? How the group is identified? > > > > Thank you very much! > > > > Best regards, > > Shuping > > > > _______________________________________________ > nvo3 mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 > > -- > > [image: 图像已被发件人删除。] <http://www.verizon.com/> > > *Gyan Mishra* > > *Network Solutions Architect * > > > > *M 301 502-1347 13101 Columbia Pike > <https://www.google.com/maps/search/13101+Columbia+Pike?entry=gmail&source=g> > *Silver Spring, MD > > > -- <http://www.verizon.com/> *Gyan Mishra* *Network Solutions A**rchitect * *M 301 502-134713101 Columbia Pike *Silver Spring, MD
_______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
