Understood.  Agreed.

Thanks

Gyan

On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 9:24 PM Pengshuping (Peng Shuping) <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Gyan,
>
>
>
> It could be taken as a existing solution to be included in the gap
> analysis part, but different from APN.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Shuping
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Gyan Mishra [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 2, 2021 10:29 PM
> *To:* Pengshuping (Peng Shuping) <[email protected]>
> *Cc:* [email protected]; [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [nvo3] eVXLAN carrying Group information
>
>
>
> That’s great news that this can be a viable marking option for APN
> signaling.
>
>
>
> Kind Regards
>
>
>
> Gyan
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 3:56 AM Pengshuping (Peng Shuping) <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Gyan,
>
>
>
> Many thanks for your information!
>
>
>
> I found the Group Policy ID explained as below,
>
>
>
>    o  Group Policy ID: 16-bit identifier that indicates the Group Policy
>
>       ID being encapsulated by this GBP shim header.  The Default GBP ID
>
>       value is special and indicates that the GBP option was not set.
>
>       Packet filters SHOULD be able to match on the Default GBP ID value
>
>       as a way to match packets that do not have the GBP option set.
>
>       The default Default GBP ID is 0, but MAY be configured to be a
>
>       value other than 0.  The allocation of Group Policy ID values is
>
>       outside the scope of this document.
>
>
>
> It seems that we could add this in the gap analysis draft,
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-peng-apn-scope-gap-analysis/
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Shuping
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Gyan Mishra [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Monday, March 1, 2021 2:50 PM
> *To:* Pengshuping (Peng Shuping) <[email protected]>
> *Cc:* [email protected]; [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [nvo3] eVXLAN carrying Group information
>
>
>
>
>
> Shuping
>
>
>
> I am not sure if you are referring to VXLAN-GPE vxlan Generic protocol
> extension which has changes in the vxlan header to support multi protocol
> encapsulation, OAM and BUM.
>
>
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-nvo3-vxlan-gpe-10
>
>
>
>
>
>    The capabilities of the VXLAN-GPE protocol can be extended by
>
>    defining next protocol "shim" headers that are used to implement new
>
>    data plane functions.  For example, Group-Based Policy (GBP) or In-
>
>    situ Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM) metadata
>
>    functionalities can be added as specified in
>
>    [I-D.lemon-vxlan-lisp-gpe-gbp 
> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-nvo3-vxlan-gpe-10#ref-I-D.lemon-vxlan-lisp-gpe-gbp>]
>  and
>
>    [I-D.brockners-ippm-ioam-vxlan-gpe 
> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-nvo3-vxlan-gpe-10#ref-I-D.brockners-ippm-ioam-vxlan-gpe>].
>
>
>
>
>
> Kind Regards
>
>
>
> Gyan
>
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 10:21 PM Pengshuping (Peng Shuping) <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
>
>
> Anybody knows about using eVXLAN to carry the Group information? What is
> the scenario? How the group is identified?
>
>
>
> Thank you very much!
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Shuping
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nvo3 mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
>
> --
>
> [image: 图像已被发件人删除。] <http://www.verizon.com/>
>
> *Gyan Mishra*
>
> *Network Solutions Architect *
>
>
>
> *M 301 502-1347 13101 Columbia Pike
> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/13101+Columbia+Pike?entry=gmail&source=g>
> *Silver Spring, MD
>
>
>
> --
>
> [image: 图像已被发件人删除。] <http://www.verizon.com/>
>
> *Gyan Mishra*
>
> *Network Solutions Architect *
>
>
>
> *M 301 502-1347 13101 Columbia Pike
> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/13101+Columbia+Pike?entry=gmail&source=g>
> *Silver Spring, MD
>
>
>
-- 

<http://www.verizon.com/>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *



*M 301 502-134713101 Columbia Pike *Silver Spring, MD
_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3

Reply via email to