Hi Joel, Thanks for your review. Per your suggestion, I added the sentence "The format and processing described here are fully compatible with those in RFC 7348”
Once I receive all other comments, I will publish the revised version. Regards, Ali From: Joel Halpern via Datatracker <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, November 12, 2025 at 9:07 AM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: draft-ietf-nvo3-rfc7348bis-02 early Rtgdir review Document: draft-ietf-nvo3-rfc7348bis Title: Virtual eXtensible Local Area Network (VXLAN): A Framework for Overlaying Virtualized Layer 2 Networks over Layer 3 Networks Reviewer: Joel Halpern Review result: Ready This is a Routing Directorate (early) review as requested. Draft: draft-ietf-nvo3-rfc7348bis-02 Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 12-Nov-2025 Summary: Ready, with one major but easily addressed concern Major: I can not find any text describing whether there is any difference in the packet format or packet processing rules between this document and RFC7348. My guess is that there is no difference, and this document should say that (e.g. it could say "The format and processing described here are fully compatible with those in RFC 7348.) If there are changes, those should be described. Minor: N/A
_______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
