Thank you.
Joel
On 11/12/2025 1:36 PM, Ali Sajassi (sajassi) wrote:
Hi Joel,
Thanks for your review. Per your suggestion, I added the sentence "The
format and processing described here are fully compatible with those
in RFC 7348”
Once I receive all other comments, I will publish the revised version.
Regards,
Ali
*From: *Joel Halpern via Datatracker <[email protected]>
*Date: *Wednesday, November 12, 2025 at 9:07 AM
*To: *[email protected] <[email protected]>
*Cc: *[email protected]
<[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>
*Subject: *draft-ietf-nvo3-rfc7348bis-02 early Rtgdir review
Document: draft-ietf-nvo3-rfc7348bis
Title: Virtual eXtensible Local Area Network (VXLAN): A Framework for
Overlaying Virtualized Layer 2 Networks over Layer 3 Networks
Reviewer: Joel
Halpern Review result: Ready
This is a Routing Directorate (early) review as requested.
Draft: draft-ietf-nvo3-rfc7348bis-02
Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern
Review Date: 12-Nov-2025
Summary: Ready, with one major but easily addressed concern
Major:
I can not find any text describing whether there is any difference
in the
packet format or packet processing rules between this document and
RFC7348.
My guess is that there is no difference, and this document should
say that
(e.g. it could say "The format and processing described here are fully
compatible with those in RFC 7348.) If there are changes, those
should be
described.
Minor: N/A
_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
