http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=9853
--- Comment #8 from Renee Danson Sommerfeld <renee.danson at sun.com> 2009-07-24 09:08:05 --- (In reply to comment #7) > Ah, that's probably a UI bug after all, but looks like I'm not the only one > that missed it ;) Sigh, guilty as charged. > Still, I would like what you're suggesting Alan - essentially making it fool > proof, for the likes of me :) Yes, I agree. I like Alan's suggestion; and I think it helps manage the concern Darren addresses about NCUs needing additional qualification. I think it's important for our internal model to retain the interface/link distinction; but making sensible choices for users who don't think about (and don't *need* to think about) that distinction improves our usability. > [ Some times I feel that it's a bit of an inconsistency in how NCUs need to be > qualified like this, while other things don't need any further qualification > other than the object type - especially when that qualification is in a > string, > which is a lot more prone to mis-typing, etc. - maybe some other form of > type-safe mechanism would be better and less error prone, but that's probably > not likely to change now... ] -- Configure bugmail: http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
