http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=11187
amaguire <alan.maguire at sun.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ACCEPTED |FIXINPROGRESS
--- Comment #5 from amaguire <alan.maguire at sun.com> 2009-09-16 08:33:30 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > ah, didn't focus on the "enable" portion of the error. I agree on changing
> > the
> > error string to make it more meaningful.
>
> One thing I wonder - and I think I might have mentioned it in the context of
> another bug - is if we should fail enables for already-enabled entities? We do
> at present, but SMF just allows such things to succeed. Should we strive to be
> consistent with SMF? I know that's not the precise issue here of course, but
> just wondered what people think...
to fix this, we
- let enables/disables of enabled/disabled objects succeed at the library level
- fix nwamadm's error message for disable_func() to read "could not disable
..."
I had thought we could then remove the NWAM_ENTITY_INVALID_STATE library
errorcode, but it's used by nwamd in the case where a WLAN selection is
impossible due to prioritized mode selecting other NCUs for activation.
--
Configure bugmail: http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
