http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=12462
--- Comment #4 from amaguire <alan.maguire at sun.com> 2009-11-05 16:25:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > [...] > > So what's the solution? It'd be nice if we could solve this with > > dependencies. > > autofs depends on the name-services milestone, and that in turn consists of > > optional_all dependencies on the various name services. Unfortunately, the > > name-services milestone doesn't notice if it's dependencies become > > unsatisfied, > > so as a consequence autofs doesn't notice if a nameservice goes offline. > > Could we use the restart_on property of dependencies? Currently, autofs' > dependency on the name-services milestone is restart_on restart; but > milestone/name-services' dependencies on the various name services are all > restart_on none. If we made those restart_on refresh, would that work? I'm > not sure how the restart_on values apply to starts and stops of the > services... yeah, this is a good idea I think. I asked on smf-discuss and the restart_on values of 'none' certainly seems to be the reason. However, I wonder if there might be deterimental side-effects as a consequence of the name-services milestone state "flapping"? It's part of multi-user, so I think we'd need to be pretty sure the side-effects are minimal... -- Configure bugmail: http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
