On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 16:56:56 +0000
Alan Maguire <Alan.Maguire at Sun.COM> wrote:

> Alan Maguire wrote:
> > I've got a few reviews to do for others today, but I thought
> > it'd be no harm to get this out there too:
> >
> > http://zhadum.east.sun.com/export/ws/amaguire/nwam1-rfes/webrev/
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> ...and here's the webrev for 12353 also:
> 
> http://zhadum.east.sun.com/export/ws/amaguire/nwam1-cr/webrev/
<rant>
conditions.c:144-146 This code burst bugs me.  We make sure that we
compare a consistent active ncp name.  But we don't keep the semantic
consistency of the enclosing function.  Further computation using that
result is dated as soon as pthread_mutex_unlock() is called.  I'm not
sure if this is an object and it is spread throughout the code, but it
bugs me.
</rant>

There isn't much to do for this in the context of this bug.

These changes look good.

        Michael

> 
> Alan
> _______________________________________________
> nwam-dev mailing list
> nwam-dev at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/nwam-dev

Reply via email to