Thank you Lesley,

Vijay and Ian has confirmed each PCN is entitled to half of the £7.46 for this 
year. In Ealing this has been an area of contention, good to get it in writing.

Suk


Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
________________________________
From: Lesley Williams via Nwl_cd <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2022 5:09:46 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Cc: WINFIELD, Cathy (NHS NORTH WEST LONDON CCG) <[email protected]>; 
PARK, Paul (NHS NORTH WEST LONDON CCG) <[email protected]>; Asiya Yunus 
<[email protected]>; ILLIAMS, Lesley (NHS NORTH WEST LONDON CCG) 
<[email protected]>
Subject: [Nwl_cd] FW: Enhanced Access Pack for PCN CDs and practices



This message originated from outside of NHSmail. Please do not click links or 
open attachments unless you recognise the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear all

Please find below the LMC concerns re the enhanced access pack and covering 
letter that you may have received from Julie Sands.

We hope this is helpful and would welcome your views and concerns.

Kind regards

Lesley



Lesley Williams

Assistant Director Primary Care Strategy

Londonwide LMCs and Londonwide Enterprise Ltd

Tel:  020 7387 2034 ext *221

Direct Dial:  020 3818 6221

Mobile: 07768 109690

Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

Web: www.lmc.org.uk<http://www.lmc.org.uk/>

Twitter: @LondonwideLMCs



​​
​
​‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑
Visit <http://www.lmc.org.uk/coronavirus-covid-19> 
www.lmc.org.uk/coronavirus-covid-19<http://www.lmc.org.uk/coronavirus-covid-19> 
for the latest official resources and guidance on covid-19.
​
​<http://www.lmc.org.uk/coronavirus-covid-19>Remember that you can use WhatsApp 
and FaceTime for online consultations as well as the usual online tools.
​🌲 Think of the environment. Do you really need to print this email?
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If 
you have received this email in error please accept our apologies and notify 
the sender.
​
The registered and office address for Londonwide Local Medical Committees 
Limited is: Tavistock House South, Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9LG. 
Registered in England No: 6391298.

​Londonwide Enterprise Limited is a wholly owned subsidiary of Londonwide Local 
Medical Committees Limited. Londonwide Enterprise Limited is registered at: 
Tavistock House South, Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9LG. Registered in England 
No. 6990874. Londonwide Enterprise Limited is registered as a Company Limited 
by Shares. VAT no: 130 1454 66.

​Londonwide Local Medical Committees Limited and Londonwide Enterprise Limited 
do not provide legal or financial advice and thereby excludes all liability 
howsoever arising in circumstances where any individual, person or entity has 
suffered any loss or damage arising from the use of information provided by 
Londonwide Local Medical Committees Limited and Londonwide Enterprise Limited 
in circumstances where professional legal or financial advice ought reasonably 
to have been obtained.

​Londonwide Local Medical Committees Limited and Londonwide Enterprise Limited 
provide guidance and support to GPs and practice teams in the Londonwide area. 
Additionally Londonwide Local Medical Committees Limited provides 
representation to GPs and practice teams in the Londonwide area. Londonwide 
Local Medical Committees Limited and Londonwide Enterprise Limited strongly 
advises individuals or practices to obtain independent legal or financial 
advice.
​

From: Cathy Winfield <[email protected]>
Sent: 18 May 2022 16:25
To: SANDS, Julie (NHS NORTH WEST LONDON CCG) <[email protected]>
Cc: SEHGAL, Javina (NHS NORTH WEST LONDON CCG) <[email protected]>; MCGALE, 
Joe (NHS NORTH WEST LONDON CCG) <[email protected]>; TAILOR, Vijay (NHS NORTH 
WEST LONDON CCG) <[email protected]>; GOODMAN, Ian (MOUNTWOOD SURGERY) 
<[email protected]>; Lesley Williams <[email protected]>; Paul Park 
<[email protected]>; Asiya Yunus <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Enhanced Access Pack for PCN CDs and practices
Importance: High



Dear both,

Thanks for this further information on Enhanced Access. We had already prepared 
a response following Joe’s presentation to CDs last week. We have added some 
comments in relation to the information Julie has sent.



We fully appreciate the challenge that the London ICSs face with the national 
DES representing a shortfall in current provision for London. Our understanding 
is that London Region have escalated this to NHSE and it has been raised with 
DH. There may be a different solution for London with regards to this issue. 
However, we are clear that the DES only mandates PCNs to deliver the stated 
Network Contract hours. Whilst there is some flexibility on when these hours 
can be delivered the provision still falls short of the current level.



The funding for the DES comprises the £1.44 plus the £6.00 that CCGs have 
previously used to commission extended access. The total sum goes to PCNs as 
part of their allocation. We note that the letter to CDs and practices refers 
to £3.76 – please can you explain the shortfall in funding?



It was helpful to see the utilisation data but it would be useful to look at 
this data specifically for the periods not covered by the DES e.g. 5.00 – 8.00 
pm on Saturdays and Sundays. This would indicate how much of an impact reducing 
the capacity to the DES spec would have.



As far as we understand it the activity of the hubs has largely been about 
demand on the day, whereas the emphasis of the DES in on pre bookable 
appointments. As the system moves back to increasing numbers of pre bookable 
appointments we may well see less demand on the day at week ends from people 
who have not been able to book routine appointments mid week. In North Central 
they reported that pre Covid they had a lot of unused capacity at week ends but 
this changed during Covid when the access to general practice changed. What was 
the pattern in NWL and do we need to plan week end capacity based on the pre 
Covid model as we restore services?



We are concerned about some of the statements on slide 26 in Joe’s presentation:



  *   The proposed model from 1st October should not see a reduction in overall 
access.

Unfortunately there will be a reduction in access as Sundays are not mandatory 
in this scheme and the NHSE Q and A make this clear. This statement may confuse 
practices and lead them to think they will have to provide Sat and Sun 8-8 to 
avoid a reduction in access from within the DES funding envelope. This is not 
the case.



  *   PCNs to consider provision of EA on Sundays and BH.

PCNs could provide appointments on Sundays and BH, if local engagement 
suggested that this was warranted, but they would then need to reduce the hours 
on Saturday or mid week to achieve this. It might be that PCNs flex 
appointments over the year to provide additional cover at peak periods or over 
4 day BHs but they cannot provide hours beyond those set out in the DES within 
the funding envelope.



  *   Ensure IT interoperability

This is a critical part of the DES but it is an area where the CCG will need to 
support as it is not entirely within the gift of PCNs to deliver – who is the 
Digital lead for this?



  *   Make agreed number of pre booked 111 slots available 1 per 1.5 hours

This is not part of the DES which simply requires PCNs to make unused 
appointments available to 111 but does not specify a number. The emphasis of 
the DES is on pre bookable appointments and routine primary care. There is a 
wider question about the appropriateness of 111 dispositions to primary care 
and plenty of examples of 111 driving inappropriate demand in primary care (and 
ED). It would be wrong to invest in capacity to meet this type of demand and it 
may be more appropriate to invest in an effective CAS in 111 so that they can 
close more cases and reduce dispositions to primary care and ED.



  *   We agree that patient engagement is going to be critical. However, it 
will be important for people to understand that PCNs are charged with 
implementing a national specification so the focus of the engagement will need 
to be on how it is implemented rather than what. There are 14.5 additional 
hours being commissioned through the DES and the question to patients is when 
these are best delivered. It is also going to be important to frame the 
discussion around need and not wants within a cash and capacity constrained 
system. The discussion could be informed by the activity analysis we have 
suggested above.

We are also concerned that your guidance to PCNs to have a minimum of 4 
meetings and the channels to be used is overly prescriptive. You mentioned that 
the CCG intends to support the engagement work but on the timeline this sits 
with PCNs and the support seems to be limited to drafting the patient survey. 
May is nearly over and until PCNs have the opportunity to think about how they 
intend to implement the DES it is difficult to commence engagement.

We are particularly concerned by the comms material and patient survey which 
states that the current provision of 8-8 and Sundays will continue. We do not 
think the activity analysis has yet been done to support this requirement and 
we are unclear how the ICS will fund this, given the current budget transfers 
to PCNs and the CCG has a financial deficit. Has a business case been agreed to 
support the ongoing commissioning of current levels of provision? We would be 
worried about making statements in the public domain that cannot subsequently 
be supported.



  *   We are pleased to see the role of Borough teams set out and their support 
is going to be critical. They could support with Comms, patient and partner 
engagement and the EQIA, for example. In other areas the ICSs are stating their 
intention to take a collaborative and supportive approach and giving clear 
instruction to PCNs to submit plans that meet the DES requirement and do not go 
beyond this. We are aware of proposals for a CD workshop, for example, that 
will be led by the ICS and cover:



  *   PCN challenges
  *   Links to the Fuller Review
  *   Patient engagement
  *   Role of the ICS
  *   Feedback from PCNs on current thinking
  *   Pt views – from HW and PPG reps
  *   Break out sessions on: 111, engagement, digital, and costing approaches 
supported by subject matter experts.
  *

It would be really helpful if NWL could consider running a similar workshop – 
perhaps at Borough, or groups of Borough level, given your size. We would be 
very happy to support any such workshops.



I think you mentioned a Task and Finish Group for EA had been established and 
we would like to be part of this please. It would also be helpful to ensure 
read across to the wider Access Task and Finish Group. We hope these comments 
are helpful and we can work with you to support our PCNs to deliver this 
challenging agenda.





Cathy Winfield

Director of Primary Care

Londonwide LMCs

Mobile: 07458 144381

Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

Diary management: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

























From: SANDS, Julie (NHS NORTH WEST LONDON CCG) 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: 18 May 2022 10:02
To: Cathy Winfield <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: SEHGAL, Javina (NHS NORTH WEST LONDON CCG) 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Enhanced Access Pack for PCN CDs and practices



Hi Cathy, please find attached the pack and cover letters going to PCN CDs and 
practices today to support their thinking and preparation of their plans for 
enhanced access from 1st October 2022.



The pack includes:

1. A slide pack which provides an overview of National Enhanced Access 
requirements and sets out the NWL Enhanced Access Engagement & Development 
Principles and the key timelines

2. A supplementary pack with baseline information on existing service provision 
and utilisation data (further data will be provided by your borough team)

3. A checklist of areas for PCN consideration when developing Enhanced Access 
plans

4. A communications pack and tools to support engagement incl. NWL Patient 
Survey, Equalities Impact Assessment template



The online patient survey that was developed with patients and leads is being 
offered to PCNs to collect feedback from their patients is going live shortly 
so it is ready for any PCNs to use to direct patients to.



Happy to talk this through if you’d find that helpful.



Thanks, Julie



Julie Sands
Assistant Director, Primary Care Contracting and Transformation
NW London Clinical Commissioning Group
15 Marylebone Road
London
NW1 5JD
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Tel: 020 7150 8300

www.nwlondonccg.nhs.uk<https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nwlondonccg.nhs.uk%2F&data=05%7C01%7CLesley.Williams%40lmc.org.uk%7Caf0c3613533f4910bdaf08da38e2954d%7C5670c82635004dfd9a7fc45939b3c53f%7C0%7C0%7C637884843060676954%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=d97iPU%2FzClZtoNS6JKua6l3UGGysadlvv5A90C2GnWQ%3D&reserved=0>

@HealthierNWL<https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2FHealthierNWL&data=05%7C01%7CLesley.Williams%40lmc.org.uk%7Caf0c3613533f4910bdaf08da38e2954d%7C5670c82635004dfd9a7fc45939b3c53f%7C0%7C0%7C637884843060676954%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=O2WMMDjI%2BXfyDlkZs03G1Z4qt6VPrw51cyNzjcq8v4A%3D&reserved=0>








**************************************************************************************
 ******************************

This message may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended 
recipient please:
i) inform the sender that you have received the message in error before 
deleting it; and
ii) do not disclose, copy or distribute information in this e-mail or take any 
action in relation to its content (to do so is strictly prohibited and may be 
unlawful).
Thank you for your co-operation.

NHSmail is the secure email, collaboration and directory service available for 
all NHS staff in England. NHSmail is approved for exchanging patient data and 
other sensitive information with NHSmail and other accredited email services.

For more information and to find out how you can switch visit Joining NHSmail – 
NHSmail 
Support<https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsupport.nhs.net%2Farticle-categories%2Fjoining-nhsmail%2F&data=05%7C01%7CLesley.Williams%40lmc.org.uk%7Caf0c3613533f4910bdaf08da38e2954d%7C5670c82635004dfd9a7fc45939b3c53f%7C0%7C0%7C637884843060676954%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Df5Uq1DMYu8zUmILNoH9d1U%2FLJovxQzPIqo4XotMmik%3D&reserved=0>


**************************************************************************************
 ******************************

This message may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended 
recipient please:
i) inform the sender that you have received the message in error before 
deleting it; and
ii) do not disclose, copy or distribute information in this e-mail or take any 
action in relation to its content (to do so is strictly prohibited and may be 
unlawful).
Thank you for your co-operation.

NHSmail is the secure email, collaboration and directory service available for 
all NHS staff in England. NHSmail is approved for exchanging patient data and 
other sensitive information with NHSmail and other accredited email services.

For more information and to find out how you can switch visit Joining NHSmail – 
NHSmail Support<https://support.nhs.net/article-categories/joining-nhsmail/>

Reply via email to