i think what they meant is that we should confine our proposal to
neighborhoods that are not likely to attract commercial wireless
carriers in the near- to mid-range future
On Aug 8, 2004, at 4:42 PM, Rob Kelley wrote:
only if its something that they can show has no
commercial value (otherwise the city would get sued by the people who
paid for franchises).
Anthony:
That's a hard one. What product of benefit to a community does not
have
some "commercial value"? Something the user couldn't afford on the
open
market? Something that is not currently sold in any market? Art?
Can you give some general examples?
Thanks,
Rob
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe:
http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/
