I can't tell how much of this is FUD (Fear Uncertainty and Doubt) reporting, 
but it's on AP and ABCNews...  
 
Does anyone else know what's really going on with the St. Cloud deployment?  
IMO, it looks like a problem with user education.  

Well, to respond to the writer, I see one lesson learned:  as the stakes 
increase, free-to-the-public wi-fi networks should expect to be put under more 
of a microscope (especially by naysayers).  Maybe SLAs are in order.
 
--
Pioneering Wi-Fi City Sees Startup Woes
Apr 24, 7:41 AM (ET)
By TRAVIS REED
 

ST. CLOUD, Fla. (AP) - More than a month after St. Cloud launched what analysts 
say is the country's first free citywide Wi-Fi network, folks in this 
28,000-person Orlando suburb are still paying to use their own Internet service 
providers as dead spots and weak signals keep some residents offline and force 
engineers to retool the free system.
 
Joe Lusardi's friends back in New York couldn't believe it when he told them 
he'd have free Internet access through this city's new Wi-Fi network. 
"Everybody's happy they were going to have it, but I don't know if they're 
happy right now," said Lusardi, a 66-year-old retired New York City transit 
worker.
 
The same troubles with the small town's big Internet project could be lessons 
for municipalities from Philadelphia to San Francisco considering similar 
networks.
 
St. Cloud officials are spending more than $2 million on a network they see as 
a pioneering model for freeing local families, schools and businesses from 
monthly Internet bills. It also promises to help the city reduce cell-phone 
bills and let paramedics in an ambulance talk by voice and video to hospital 
doctors.
 
Instead, what they have so far is a work in progress.
 
"All technology has its hiccups, and sometimes more than hiccups," St. Cloud 
Mayor Donna Hart said. "I think that it's going to be a major challenge, and 
it'll probably be a major challenge for some time until the technology is such 
that it works properly."
 
Wi-Fi is the same technology behind wireless Internet access in coffee shops, 
airports and college campuses around the country.
Several cities have Wi-Fi hotspots, but St. Cloud's 15-square-mile network is 
the first to offer free access citywide, said Seattle-based technology writer 
Glenn Fleishman, who runs a Web site called Wi-Fi Networking News.
 
Other cities like Tempe, Ariz., have networks over a larger area (187 square 
miles), but access isn't free. Planned projects in places like Chicago and 
Philadelphia would also dwarf St. Cloud's network, but also require a fee for 
access.
 
Google Inc. (GOOG) and EarthLink Inc. (ELNK) are teaming up to build a $15 
million Wi-Fi network across San Francisco, and their proposal is entering 
final negotiations. EarthLink's faster offering would cost $20 per month, while 
Google would provide a slower, free service financed by advertising.
 
St. Cloud launched the network on a trial basis in May 2004 in a new division 
of town to help give businesses an incentive to relocate. After further 
exploring the benefits, officials decided to expand it citywide.
 
Project supporters say increased efficiency in city government will cover the 
network's $2.6 million buildout and estimated $400,000 annual operating expense.
 
For example, phones that use the Wi-Fi network will allow it to cut cell-phone 
bills for police and city workers. The city can avoid adding 10 more building 
inspectors because the network will existing employees to enter and access data 
onsite instead of driving back to the office.
 
The network also could keep the estimated $450 that St. Cloud households now 
spend each year on high-speed access in the local economy.
 
As of last week, nearly 3,500 users had registered for the network, logging 
176,189 total hours of use. St. Cloud contracted with Hewlett-Packard Co. to 
build the project and provide customer support.
 
"HP is working with the city and its partners to optimize the solution and 
install additional access points to help improve signal strength in isolated 
areas of the city," the company said in a statement.
 
So far, there have been plenty of calls from frustrated residents. Some can see 
receivers from their homes and still can't sign on - even on the porch. Others 
have tried to connect countless times.
 
Still, HP said that there were only 842 help-line calls out of more than 50,000 
user sessions in the first 45 days of service.
At first, a desktop computer in Lusardi's house could use the Wi-Fi network 
with no problem, but his laptop would only work outdoors. Even then it was too 
slow and unreliable, so he kept his $20 per month Sprint DSL service.
Now the desktop doesn't even work, and he's completely abandoned the idea of 
dropping his pay service and using the network.
 
"It's just total frustration," Lusardi said. "I'm going to stay with the DSL 
and just forget it, because I don't think it's going to work. Very few people 
are going to use it, and they're going to say it's underutilized and they're 
going to shut it down."
 
Lusardi didn't shell out the money for a signal-boosting device St. Cloud 
recommends for those having trouble connecting - City Hall sells them for $170.
 
Fleishman said the fact that others share Lusardi's frustration is a crucial 
technical and public relations problem for the vanguard project. He said 
residents should understand many won't be able to use the free network without 
additional equipment to strengthen the signal.
 
"It's very large and it's very ambitious, so they're going to hit some of these 
problems before some of the marketing and technology is out there," he said. 
"Products have to catch up to this new market."
 
Fleishman said other cities would likely have the same problems - in bigger 
cities, even larger ones - if they didn't fully inform the public of necessary 
equipment and network limits.
 
Former Mayor Glenn Sangiovanni, who spearheaded the project, stressed that 
kinks were still being worked out, but noted that not everyone was having 
problems.
 
"There's a lot of variables, and that's part of it," Sangiovanni said. "It 
could be the block construction you have, it could be the tin roof you have. 
There's lots of different things that could be unique to your environment as 
opposed to my environment.
 
"We went into this with the expectation that it's really a year plan that we're 
going to implement," he added. "You don't know what you're going to get into 
when you take on the whole city because you can't stress test that."
 
Ashley Austin, a freshman at nearby Florida Christian College, said she likes 
using the network to do homework on the city's picturesque downtown lakefront. 
She said it's also the only way to get online if Internet service is down at 
the wireless telephone store where she works.
 
"So far I haven't had any problems with the use that I've gotten out of it," 
she said.
 
Resident Chuck Cooper, a former city commissioner, bought an antenna, but still 
gets a shaky connection. Navigating from one site to another still produces 
errors.
 
Generally, he says, it's slightly faster than dial-up access. But even critics 
like him are quick to praise the endeavor in between grumbles over early 
problems.
 
"All in all, I guess it's a good idea," Cooper said. "I equate it to cell 
phones 10 to 15 years ago. You used to have a lot of dropped calls, but now 
they're substantially better. Hopefully, this will get a little better a lot 
quicker." 
 
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/

Reply via email to