I would say an <ul> would be most appropriate here, since it's a list of products. The fact that they're in a table-shapped grid is just coincidental.
Stig Manning wrote: > Michael wrote: > >> What I had previously was a tableless page layout, with a table to display >> products in 2 rows of 5 products. >> >> I have now modified this so the <table> option appears no where in the code. >> >> I did this with a container DIV and 2x DIV rows. >> >> > What you have there is tabular data which means you use <table>; that is > semantically correct. Sure, using <table> for page structure or for > positioning elements is not semantically correct, and using <div> is > correct. > > What is it with web devs / designers either using <tables> everywhere, > or nowhere at all even when required? > > This stupid thread is filling up my PHPUG folder. Tables for tabular > data. Divs for page divisions. > > Stuff like: > > <div class="table-wrapper"> > <div class="table"> > <div class="tr"> > <div class="th">A</div> > <div class="th">B</div> > <div class="th">C</div> > > Makes me cry. No really it does. > > -Stig > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ NZ PHP Users Group: http://groups.google.com/group/nzphpug To post, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
