I think Stig has a fair point. This thread and the others are OT but aren't marked as such, and have the potential to go on forever because switching from tables to CSS is actually a pretty major learning exercise. Once the initial layout is sorted, the next question will be 'Why does IE do ____ with with my layout' and so on.
Someone has already provided a good list of resources, so the OP should go check those out rather than persisting with 3 or 4 threads on CSS/HTML. I'm sure most people here are happy to answer questions, but topics like Tables to CSS have been covered far better elsewhere and there is no need to repeat this age-old discussion here. Harvey. S.Mohammed Alsharaf wrote: > > You are right. if data need to be displayed in table then use table. > this what i do. why i waste my time with div and browser issues and > hacks to display table with divs. > > BUT if someone want to do this "divs" its their business, they can do > what they want. if you want to help, thats good help. if you don't > want to help, ignore and move ON. don't be stupid and "Smart" > > its good to be creative and create something that is unusual. > > Dont register with PHPUG if you dont want to receive emails!!! > > > This stupid thread is filling up my PHPUG folder. Tables for tabular > > data. Divs for page divisions. > > > > Stuff like: > > > > <div class="table-wrapper"> > > <div class="table"> > > <div class="tr"> > > <div class="th">A</div> > > <div class="th">B</div> > > <div class="th">C</div> > > > > Makes me cry. No really it does. > > > > -Stig > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ NZ PHP Users Group: http://groups.google.com/group/nzphpug To post, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
