This is a reasonable approach. My only concern is that some people may miss the 
updated bundle and wonder why they're encountering problems. 

- Eli 

On Jun 27, 2012, at 3:21 PM, Anthony Whyte wrote:

> I would prefer that we perform a maintenance release of the affected bundle 
> (resource) as opposed to performing a full OAE 1.3.1 maintenance release.  
> Are there any objections to this approach?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Anthony
> 
> 
> On Jun 27, 2012, at 1:57 PM, Eli Cochran wrote:
> 
>> In the process of integrating OAE 1.3 here at Berkeley, Yu-Hung discovered a 
>> serious blocker bug in the 1.3 release. 
>> 
>> If sharing for a content item or document is set to private, you can't 
>> delete it, even if you own it.  
>> 
>> Luckily we found that the issue had already been written up [1] and Zack had 
>> already checked a fix in for 1.4 [2]. It was very easy to cherry-pick the 
>> fix over. 
>> 
>> Any other institution running 1.3 should pick up this change. I would also 
>> argue that this issue is serious enough that it might warrant a maintenance 
>> release. 
>> 
>> [1] https://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/KERN-2893
>> [2] 
>> https://github.com/sakaiproject/nakamura/commit/f8e2bb8b1de9345610bb58b8f9c7b26d83d877a3
>>  
>> . . . . . . . . . . .  .  .   .    .      .         .              .         
>>             .
>> 
>> Eli Cochran
>> project manager, CalCentral project
>> Educational Technology Services, UC Berkeley
>> 
>> "Software is hard" - Donald Knuth 
>> 
> 

. . . . . . . . . . .  .  .   .    .      .         .              .            
         .

Eli Cochran
project manager, CalCentral
user interaction developer
ETS, UC Berkeley

_______________________________________________
oae-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/oae-dev

Reply via email to