Re: Javadoc: {@code...} instead of ?

[Angela Schreiber]

hi michael

FWIW: I switched to {@code} in the org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr package
space.

fine with me... i don't have strong feelings in either way and will
hopefully have not problem adjusting to either solution.
using a common coding style will be a good thing imo. usually i
don't wish to know the author of every single line (and if i do
i use svn blame ;)

regards
angela

On 15.3.12 16:10, Stefan Guggisberg wrote:

On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Felix Meschberger<fmesc...@adobe.com>   wrote:

Hi,

Am 15.03.2012 um 15:46 schrieb Michael Dürig:

Hi,

What do people feel about using {@code null} instead of
<code>null</code>   in javadoc? Personally I prefer the second one since
it is lighter on the eye but don't have a strong opinion. I think
however we should use all the same format.

I didn't know the {@code} tag exists so I always use the<code>...</code>   
style.

same here. i realize that i am getting old;)
i kind of like the {@code} variant but i don't feel strong either way.

cheers
stefan

   From a formatting POV (allowing to format segments with tags different 
from<code>) it might really make sense to use the tag instead of the html 
element.

Regards
Felix