[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-19?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13231022#comment-13231022
]
Stefan Guggisberg commented on OAK-19:
--------------------------------------
> we need to eliminate all stuff that is not really guaranteed by JSON (as
> defined in RFC 4627), such as the ordering of members being considered
> relevant.
that's not the case anymore.
"a node consists of an unordered set of name -> item mappings.
each property and child node is uniquely named and a single name can only refer
to a property or a child node, not both at the same time." [1]
[1] http://wiki.apache.org/jackrabbit/RepositoryMicroKernel
> Consolidate JSON utilities
> --------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-19
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-19
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: core, jcr
> Reporter: angela
>
> i seems confusing to me that we are having multiple different json utilities
> in the
> current oak stack:
> - a dependency to google-json
> - a complete json utility including parser, json abstraction in oak-jcr
> (org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.json)
> - another json utility in org.apache.jackrabbit.mk.json containing tokenizer
> et. al.
> imo we should only have one single json utility and i would therefore suggest
> that
> we discuss this issue and try to reach a consensus which json-library we want
> to use.
> what do you think?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
