hi
just found in the mk API that the usage of revision isn't
completely consistent:
- 'revision number'
-> revision id was probably more appropriate
- 'revision' when referring to a String
-> i would suggest to use again 'revision id'
and consequently only use 'revision' when really referring
to the revision.
example: MicroKernel#getHeadRevision String
MicroKernel#waitForCommit (fixed in rev. 1325699)
- there are cases where the API/javadoc refers to a revision
but in fact it means some sort of revision-info that
consists of revisionID + time stamp
example: MicroKernel#getRevisions, javadoc of #getJournal
what do you think? was this worth being addressed?
angela
