On 23.4.12 13:33, Angela Schreiber wrote:
hi i would like to suggest that we rename ContentTree to Tree. as the Content-prefix looks a bit artificial (and arbitrary) to me. while i see the point in having the ability to distinguish jcr-Session from oak-Session and jcr-Repository from oak-Repository, i fail to see the benefit for the ContentTree interface though. unless someone objects, i would go ahead and rename the interface and it's usages.
+1 Michael
kind regards angela
