hi all i keep wondering what was the reason for keeping implementations of the oak-api in different packages. specifically i don't fully understand what was the logic behind having some classes in the oak.core package (KernelContentSession), while others are in the oak.kernel package (KernelPropertyState).
that separation doesn't make too much sense to me as there are cross-dependencies in both directions. so, i would like to suggest that we move the classes from the kernel package to the core package. if nobody objects i would go ahead and commit the move later on today. kind regards angela
